Poster (10)
21.
Poster
Velocity perception in 3-D environments. 19th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 1996), Strasbourg, France (1996)
22.
Poster
The role of components in recognition across changes of view. 19th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 1996), Strasbourg, France (1996)
23.
Poster
A comparison of grasping real and virtual objects. 19th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP 1996), Strasbourg, France (1996)
24.
Poster
Self-organization of the sensorimotor control in an autonomous system using genetic algorithms. 24th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference: Brain and Evolution, Göttingen, Germany (1996)
25.
Poster
Bilateral symmetry of human faces helps to generalize to novel views. 24th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference: Brain and Evolution, Göttingen, Germany (1996)
26.
Poster
Top-down influence of recognition on stereoscopic depth perception. Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 1996), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (1996)
27.
Poster
Interdependence of feature dimensions in the representation of 3D objects. Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 1996), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (1996)
28.
Poster
The contribution of distinct component configurations to object recognition across changes of view. Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 1996), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (1996)
29.
Poster
Classifying faces by sex is more accurate with 3D shape information than with texture. Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 1996), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (1996)
30.
Poster
What is the basis for good performance to symmetric views of faces? Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO 1996), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA (1996)
Bericht (9)
31.
Bericht
43). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 12 S.
An Introduction to Object Recognition (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 32.
Bericht
42). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 18 S.
What object attributes determine canonical views? (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 33.
Bericht
40). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 8 S.
Features of the representation space for 3D objects (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 34.
Bericht
38). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 14 S.
How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views? (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 35.
Bericht
33). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996)
Learning View Graphs for Robot Navigation (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 36.
Bericht
35). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 10 S.
Evolution of the Sensorimotor Control in an Autonomous Agent (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 37.
Bericht
31). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 13 S.
Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 38.
Bericht
30). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 11 S.
Scene Recognition Workshop, Tübingen July 3-5, 1996 (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 39.
Bericht
27). Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany (1996), 11 S.
Active Kinetic Depth Effect (Technical Report of the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics,